Genetics solutions for improved chicken production in Ghana
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The Tropical Poultry Genetics Solutions project intervention in Ghana, a collaboration between the International Livestock Research Institute and the University of Ghana, with support from Ghana’s Ministry of Food and Agriculture, seeks to test the adaptability, productivity and farmer preferences of tropically adapted improved dual-purpose chicken genotypes under different production systems. Poultry farmers from two agroecological zones in five of the 16 regions of Ghana were selected to participate in the project. These farmers were provided with selected tropically adapted chicken genotypes, namely Kuroiler and Hubbard, to manage under their production system, and data was collected on bird performance in terms of body weight, egg production, quality and overall acceptability by the farmers. The findings indicate a high farmer preference for, and significantly better (p ≤ 0.05) growth performance of the introduced chicken genotypes compared to local chickens. For instance, the introduced birds reached an average weight of 2kg within 18 weeks, compared to local chickens which required 30 weeks on average to reach 1.6kg under semi-intensive production management conditions. Additionally, the egg production and carcass attributes of these selected genotypes were found to be comparable to those of the local chickens. Based on these positive results, we recommend the multiplication and widespread adoption of Kuroiler and Hubbard chicken strains among smallholder farmers in Ghana. By doing so, we anticipate improved chicken production, increased income generation, enhanced livelihoods and protein food security in the country.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright of the articles published in Genetic Resources and grant the journal right of first publication with open access. All articles published in Genetic Resource are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to download, share and adapt the work for commercial and non-commercial purposes as long as proper attribution to the original article is given. Genetic Resources permits and encourages authors to post items submitted to the journal (including the publisher's final layout) on personal websites or institutional repositories after acceptance and/or publication, while providing bibliographic details that credit their publication in Genetic Resources.
Aboe, P et al. (2006). “Free-range village chickens on the Accra Plains, Ghana: Their contribution to households”. Trop. Anim. Health and Prod 38, pp. 223–234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-006-4357-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-006-4357-9
Ajayi, F (2010). “Nigerian indigenous chicken: a valuable genetic resource for meat and egg production”. Asian Jnl. of Poult. Sci 4(4), pp. 164–172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/ajpsaj.2010.164.172
Bamidele, O et al. (2023). “Growth performance, survivability and profitability of improved smallholder chicken genetics in Nigeria: A COVID-19 intervention study”. Frontiers in Genets 13, p. 1033654. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.1033654. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.1033654
Bedru, B A (2021). Comparative performance evaluation of local and tropical adapted exotic breeds of chickens in Ethiopia. Ethiopia.
Bekele, B et al. (2022). “Production performance and egg quality evaluation of indigenous chickens across different agro-ecologies of Southern Ethiopia”. Vet. Int. Sciences 20(1), pp. 133–145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12982/VIS.2022.012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12982/VIS.2022.012
Birhanu, M Y et al. (2023). “Smallholder poultry production in the context of increasing global food prices: roles in poverty reduction and food security”. Anim. Frontiers 13(1), pp. 17–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/af/vfac069. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/af/vfac069
Dar, M A et al. (2018). “Genetics of disease resistance in chicken”. In: Application of Genetics and Genomics in Poultry Science. Ed. by X Liu. doi: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.716 50, pp. 163–174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.77088
Dessie, T and F Getachew (2016). The Kuroiler Breed. African Chicken Genetic Gains Factsheet. International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI). URL: https://www.ilri.org/research/projects/african-chicken-genetic-gains-acgg.
Dessie, T, T Taye, et al. (2011). “Current state of knowledge on phenotypic characteristics of indigenous chickens in the tropics”. World’s Poult. Sci. J 67(3), pp. 507–516. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933911000559. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933911000559
Faustin, V et al. (2010). “Peace, health or fortune?: Preferences for chicken traits in rural Benin”. Ecol. Econs 69(9), pp. 1848–1857. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.027. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.027
Fekede, G et al. (2021). “On-farm comparative production and reproduction performance evaluation of Sasso, Sasso-RIR, Koekoek and Improved Local chicken breeds in Bako Tibe and Dano districts of western Oromia, Ethiopia”. Livest. Res. for Rural Dev 33(1). URL: http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd33/1/gutu3315.html.
Guni, F et al. (2021). “Performance evaluation of Kuroiler and Sasso chicken breeds reared under farmer management conditions in highland and lowland areas of Mvomero district, Eastern Tanzania”. Trop. Anim. Hlth. and Prod 53, pp. 1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-021-02693-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-021-02693-4
ICTD (2010). “Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development. Article No. 18”. In: doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/2369220.2369236, pp. 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2369220.2369236
Kassa, B et al. (2021). “On-farm comparative evaluation of production performance of tropically adapted exotic chicken breeds in western Amhara”. Ethiopia. Jnl. of Appl. Poult. Res 30(4), p. 100194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japr.2021.100194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japr.2021.100194
Kejela, Y, S Banerjee, and M Taye (2019). “Some internal and external egg quality characteristics of local and exotic chickens reared in Yirgalem and Hawassa towns, Ethiopia”. Int. Jnl. of Livest. Prod 10(5), pp. 135–142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5897/IJLP2018.0547. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5897/IJLP2018.0547
Melesse, A (2014). “Significance of scavenging chicken production in the rural community of Africa for enhanced food security”. World’s Poult. Sci. Jnl 70(3), pp. 593–606. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933914000646
Melesse, A, S Maak, and G Von Lengerken (2010). “Effect of long-term heat stress on egg quality traits of Ethiopian naked neck chickens and their F1 crosses with Lohmann White and New Hampshire chicken breeds”. Livest. Res. for Rural Devt 22(4), pp. 71–71.
Moula, N et al. (2013). “Quality assessment of marketed eggs in Bassekabylie (Algeria)”. Brazilian J. Poult. Sci 15, pp. 395–399. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2013000400015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2013000400015
Mulugeta, S, G Goshu, and W Esatu (2020). “Growth performance of DZ-white and Improved Horro chicken breeds under different agro-ecological zones of Ethiopia”. J. Livest. Sci 11(1), pp. 45–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33259/JLivestSci.2020.45-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33259/JLivestSci.2020.45-53
Ochieng, J, G Owuor, and B O Bebe (2013). “Management practices and challenges in smallholder indigenous chicken production in Western Kenya”. J. Agric. and Rural Dev, in the Trop. and Subtrop 114(1).
Osei-Amponsah, R, B B Kayang, and A Naazie (2012). “Age, genotype and sex effects on growth performance of local chickens kept under improved management in Ghana”. Trop. Anim. Hlth. and Prod 44, pp. 29–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-011-0010-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-011-0010-3
Osei-Amponsah, R, B Kayang, H Manu, et al. (2014). “Egg quality traits of local Ghanaian chickens and influence of storage period”. Anim. Genet. Res 55, pp. 93–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2078633614000290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2078633614000290
Osei-Amponsah, R, B Kayang, and A Naazie (2013). “Phenotypic and genetic parameters for production traits of local chickens in Ghana”. Anim. Genet. Res 53, pp. 45–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2078633613000271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2078633613000271
Osei-Amponsah, R, B Kayang, A Naazie, et al. (2015). “Phenotypic characterization of local Ghanaian chickens: egg-laying performance under improved management conditions”. Anim. Genet. Res 56, pp. 29–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2078633615000041. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2078633615000041
Singh, M et al. (2022). “Backyard poultry farming with improved germplasm: Sustainable food production and nutritional security in fragile ecosystem”. Frontiers in Sus. Food Systems 6, p. 962268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2022.962268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2022.962268
Sonaiya, E B and S E J Swan (2004). Incubation and Hatching, Small-Scale Poultry Production Technical Guide. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. URL: http://www.fao.org/docrep/008/y5169e/y5169e06.htm.
Steel, R G and J H Torrie (1981). Principles and procedures of statistics, a biometrical approach.2nd, p. 633.
Terfa, Z G et al. (2019). “Understanding farmers’ preference for traits of chickens in rural Ethiopia”. Agric. Econs 50(4), pp. 451–463. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12502
W Alemu, S et al. (2021). “Evaluation of live body weight and the number of eggs produced by introduced and local chickens in Ethiopia”. Acta Agric. Scand., Section A-Animal Science 70(2), pp. 71–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09064702.2021.1891278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09064702.2021.1891278
Yakubu, A, D Ogah, and R Barde (2008). “Productivity and egg quality characteristics of free range naked-neck and normal feathered Nigerian indigenous chickens”. Int. J. Poult. Sci 7(6), pp. 579–585. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2008.579.585
This journal has been conceived as part of the